Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Annie Dillard Nature writer

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Annie Dillard Nature writer. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Annie Dillard Nature writer paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Annie Dillard Nature writer, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Annie Dillard Nature writer paper at affordable prices!


Annie Dillard's view of nature is simply stated in 'Teaching a Stone to Talk' "We are here to witness." (0) We are not here to analyze, conquer, tame or understand and she does not use any of these themes in her writing like so many other nature writers.


In 'Very Like a Whale', Robert Finch is obsessed with the question of why so many people came to observe the whale, and in analyzing this question concludes that they come to confirm their 'otherness'. In some ways, this does not seem like a nature essay at all, but an essay about human nature, with the whale playing the role of object lesson.


In 'The Face of a Spider', David Quammen writes about a very human, moral dilemma, "How should a human behave toward the members of other living species?" (). This essay seems to be more about humans and less about spiders than the other way around. Again, the theme is "otherness". Are humans 'other' than spiders? Should humans behave in the same way toward spiders as they do towards members of their own species? What is the high moral ground and is it practical?


In Robert Finch's essay, he asks a question and then provides an answer. His descriptions of the whale and the beach are complete, but you never feel connected to the whale, you feel connected to the human question. In David Quammen's essay, his descriptions of the spiders face make you feel completely separate from the spider. The subject is humanity, not nature.


If Annie Dillard, on the other hand, had come upon the dead or dying whale, I believe the essay would have been very different. There would have been no effort to analyze the role of the whale in her own human experience. Instead, I think we would have gotten a gut-wrenching essay on exactly what was happening to the whale, and maybe what it felt like to be the whale dying in public.


If Ms. Dillard had come upon a family of spiders in her office, I think she would have written about what it was like to be the baby spider discovering what its body could do, and where it could go. I think she would have killed the spiders too, but I doubt she would have written about it, because that is not where the connection is. The connection is in the observation of the behavior and in feeling what the spiders were feeling from their point of view. The challenge then is to take this feeling and translate it into words.


Annie Dillard's observations tend to be more primeval than other writers are. Her talent, the thing that makes her writing different to me, is how she seems not just to observe natural things, but also to connect with them. This is most clear in her essay 'Living Like Weasels' where she describes a sudden encounter with a weasel as "a sudden beating of brains". (67) Her sentences do not just describe, they make you feel, and they grab hold of your insides and shake you.


John Tallmadge says that Annie Dillard sees nature as "visceral, overpowering and possibly dangerous". I agree, although I would say it is definitely dangerous. When she came face to face with the weasel, she emphasized its attack-and-never-release behavior, even though she was never in any actual danger from the encounter. Still, it is those most basic survival behaviors, instinctual behaviors that are so often emphasized in her writing. Although she describes the physical appearance of the weasel in her essay, you are never encouraged to see it as a cuddly, harmless creature.


Mr. Tallmadge describes a certain mysticism in Annie Dillard's approach to writing. He describes this as a "direct, unmediated communion with the divine." For Annie Dillard nature is the divine. Richard Speakes thinks that Annie Dillard believes the "world is revealing, constantly, all one needs revealed if one would pay attention and participate." Or, as Ms. Dillard would say, if one would quit participating in our own play and take the time to witness.


As she says, "wherever there is stillness there is the still small voice, God's speaking from the whirlwind" (Stones 88). When Annie Dillard can achieve that stillness, she can hear God in the wind, in a stone, and in the emptiness of the weasel's mind. Through her writing, she can help us hear Him too.


Please note that this sample paper on Annie Dillard Nature writer is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Annie Dillard Nature writer, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Annie Dillard Nature writer will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Tuesday, February 4, 2020

123

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on 123. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality 123 paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in 123, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your 123 paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!


I am standing here, not to offend anyone that smokes but to persuade teenagers to quit


smoking and to persuade people not to start smoking.


Every year in the United States, 6,000 teenagers light up their first cigarette and


,000 become regular smokers. Approximately .6 million packs of cigarettes are sold


Cheap custom writing service can write essays on 123


illegally to teenagers under 18 everyday1. People die because of Aids, car accidents,


suicide, fires, alcohol but most of the people die from smoking.


Almost every teenager should know that smoking is bad for you and that it causes


many health problems, but why do they start in the first place?


Peer pressure, advertisement, stress relief, and seeing family members, and friends


around them doing it, are some of the reasons for teenagers to take the first puff. Also it


is because they are curious about it and think that they can quit at any time they want but;


that is not true at all.


Don't even think about lighting up a cigarette. Why? Because it is harmful to our


environment and it is harmful to you. A cigarette contains over ,000 different chemicals


and one of the drugs is nicotine, which keeps you addicted making it harder for you to


quit.


A teenager is like a match and it can be lighted when it is persuaded to smoke.


He/she can light up other matches as well because teenagers are influenced by the people


of their surroundings. The cycle can keep on going on and on and can affect the


non-smokers by second-hand smoke.


The only way to make our world a smoke-free environment is for all smokers to


quit smoking not for just 1 or years but for their entire life. It is never too late for


people to quit smoking. Your friends and family members will support you. There is


Nicotine gum and other drugs that can also help you quit


If regular smokers continue to smoke and if more and more teenagers become


smokers then the air will be fill with passive smoke. You may not care about your health,


but think about the people you live with and the people in your neighborhood before you


light up another cigarette. As you exhale the smoke from a cigarette, the people around


you would be inhaling the passive smoke4. Sooner or later non-smokers will have to


wear masks when they go out to avoid second-hand smoke. To prevent this from


happening, you have to stop smoking for your health, for your environment, and for your


family members.


I believe that one day there won't be any deaths caused by smoking or


second-hand smoke. I believe that one day all cigarettes will not be lighted. I believe that


one day when I wake up the world will be a smoke-free environment.


Please note that this sample paper on 123 is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on 123, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on 123 will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Monday, February 3, 2020

WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY paper at affordable prices!


WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS


BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY


A proper definition for democracy is a form of government organized in accordance with the principles of popular soverngnity, political equality, popular consultation, and majority rule. There are two modern liberal democracies in the world in every country, parliamentary systems and the presidential system. In most parts of the Western world, in such countries as Great Britain and the Neverthalands use the parliamentary system. In the Eastern parts of the world, in such countries as the United States, use the presidential system. The most well organized system that is better for democracy is the presidential system, because of its advantages, especially the separation of powers along with how well it works in the different parts of the world. It will be shown how the presidential system works in the parts of the world, how the parliamentary systems works in the parts of the world, the disadvantages and advantages of each, and why the presidential system is better for democracy.


The book defines the parliamentary system as the government worked with the fusion of powers principles, which is the "concentration of all policy-making power in the legislative." This statement just means that all of law making bodies work together to make the laws of the land. In the parliamentary system, the legislative does more than just make the laws, but they choose among its members in the cabinet to express and exercise the executive powers is by a cabinet and its members are mostly legislative and are chosen by and are responsible for the legislature. Also in this system there are indeterminate terms of office meaning that the members in the executive cabinet have no set limit to serve a term in the legislative. For example, a member of the parliament can serve in the legislative until they decide to leave or if they die for any reason. Also there are some other characteristics to this system. First, there are more than one or two political parties. Many times this is an example of a coalition government, which is defined by the book as, "the arrangements in which the government is managed by an alliance of two or more separate parties each of which has members in the top ministerial post." For example, in a parliamentary party system the different parties may work in the legislature to get things done. This is an advantage of having this system apart of the government because this system may be more fractionalized and works together. This method does not always work because there should be some differences and less fractionization for a government to have different views and establish a government.


Custom Essays on WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY


In a parliamentary system, there are too many different figures in the representational government such as Head of State and Head of Government, which is the prime minister and could have crossed up powers. For example, depending on the person and no real knowledge of what is going on or if the person just does not want to obey common rule. The Head of State could want all of the power and not to follow the laws of the parliamentary system and rule by law. This could cause a problem between the distinctions of the Head of State and the Head of Government. In an article entitled There Is No Separation of Powers in a Parliamentary System; it states that people have the tendency to be confused by thinking that appointing different people to sit in the executive seat you have a separation of power in the system because they all work together with no separation or distinction of powers. The reason for this is because of its origin and nature they do not allow for one another to collide. The meaning behind this is that, anytime an executive has to depend on the legislative for its way of being legitimate there is no real separation.


The presidential system is defined by the book as the government worked with the separation of power principles, which means that the different departments really do not work together and are very specific structural and historical. The reason why it is said to be historical is because, the presidential model of the United States is a direct rejection of a strong executive government with their revolt against the British, in turn, which was a revolt against the parliamentary system. According to our textbook, the executive in a presidential system is that the president can function independently of the legislature. The President does not need the legal confidence of the legislative or Congress in order to remain in office, unless in the extreme case of impeachment. He is directly elected by the majority rule of the people. Also, there is no Head of State, just a Head of Government, which is the president. This is better because there is just one person that has the power besides the legislative instead of two, which there would have to be a distinction of power.


The biggest advantage that the presidential system has is the separation of powers. The textbook defines separation of powers as the division of government power among equal legislative, executive, and judicial. This means that all parts of government are equal as for power but there powers should not overlap each other. Our textbook also shows two main devices under this principle which are separation of personnel, which means that under the U.S. Constitution there are specific prohibition of any person from holding office in more than one of the three branches of government at a time. For example, a federal judge cannot be on the president's cabinet and be a senator all at the same time. Another main device in the principle is the checks and balance, this give the three different branches the power to check each other. An example is that Congress is empowered to check the president by refusing to pass bills the president request, withholding appropriations for executive and administrative agencies, denying approval of presidential appointments to other top executive posts, and impeachment. This principle works better for democracy because it keeps everyone accountable for what goes on in the government instead of the powers working together getting in each others way. There should be separation of powers to make the government work better and stay focus on their duties.


In conclusion, there are advantages and disadvantages of both systems, but the presidential system is better for democracy. The reason for my answer is the separation of powers over the fusion of powers. There is no real separation in a parliamentary system. Separation of powers is better for a democracy because the powers of the government should be separate in order for a government to work orderly and function continuously to make the country stay in balance.


Please note that this sample paper on WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY, we are here to assist you. Your research paper on WHY THE PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM IS BETTER FOR OUR DEMOCRACY will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Thursday, January 30, 2020

Siddartha and Modern teens.

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Siddartha and Modern teens.. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Siddartha and Modern teens. paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Siddartha and Modern teens., therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Siddartha and Modern teens. paper at affordable prices with cheap writing service!


In Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse, the title character’s journey through life is similar to the life that many teenagers today face. Siddhartha’s story chronicles his childhood to his old age, yet many times throughout there are parallels between his life and a teenager’s. It begins with his questioning of authority and the explanations of life as he knows it. He does not wholly trust his elders’ words on how the world was created and humans’ purpose on earth â€'And where was Atman to be found, where did He dwell, where did His eternal heart beat, if not within the Self, in the innermost, in the eternal which each person carried within him? But where was this self, in the innermost?” (4).


Siddhartha is not satisfied with these teachings, even though he respects the Brahmins and his father, much as a teenager will question their role in the world around them. Another important parallel is that of coming of age. There comes a time when even Siddhartha, born into the highest class in the caste system, and a prince, feels that he needs to leave home. This is not easy for his father, and this trait he holds in common with parents everywhere


The first light of day entered the room. The Brahmin saw that Siddhartha’s knees trembled slightly, but there was no trembling in Siddhartha’s face; his eyes looked far away. Then the father realized that Siddhartha could no longer remain with him at homeâ€"that he had already left him ( ).


Siddhartha realizes that this is the path he must take, and indirectly forces his father to let him leave. Another test for Siddhartha is when he must leave his friend Govinda. He realizes that in order for him to be happy, he still needs to follow a different path, even if he is separated from his best friend â€'‘You have heard my blessing, Govinda. I repeat it. May you travel this path to the end. May you find salvation!’” In that moment, Govinda realized his friend was leaving him and he began to weep” (4). Siddhartha chooses what he think is best for him in the long run; he does not sway to another’s opinion. Many teens must give up on their friends, if they want to do what they think is best for them. Although Siddhartha lived an amazing life and founded a belief system, his life experiences are quite similar to those that all teenagers must face.


Custom writing service can write essays on Siddartha and Modern teens.


Please note that this sample paper on Siddartha and Modern teens. is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Siddartha and Modern teens., we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on Siddartha and Modern teens. will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


The Puritans

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on The Puritans. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality The Puritans paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in The Puritans, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your The Puritans paper at affordable prices!


Puritans were English Protestants who wished to reform and purify the Church of England of what they considered to be unacceptable remains of Roman Catholicism. In the 160s leaders of the English state and church grew being heartless to Puritan demands. They insisted that the Puritans conform to religious practices that they hated, removing their ministers from office and threatening them with" extirpation from the earth if they did not follow their rules. Passionate Puritan laymen received savage punishments. For example, in 160 a man was sentenced to life imprisonment, his property was confiscated, his nose slit, his ear was cut off, and his forehead branded with "S.S." (Sower of Sedition).


Beginning in 160 as many as 0,000 Puritans immigrated to America from England to gain the liberty to worship God as they chose. Most settled in New England, but some went as far as the West Indies. The Puritans were "non-separating Congregationalists." Unlike the Pilgrims, who came to Massachusetts in 160, the Puritans believed that the Church of England was a true church, though it was in need of major improvement. Every New England Congregational church was considered an independent unit, grateful to no chain of command. The membership was composed initially of men and women who had undergone a change experience and could prove it to other members. Puritan leaders hoped that once their experiment was successful, England would imitate it by instituting a church order modeled after the New England Way.


The first groups came in the Mayflower and were included with the group called Pilgrims. Their religious principles set them apart as Puritans. They believed that the Bible was Gods true law and that it provided a plan for living. The established church of the day, described access to God as simple. Puritans stripped away the traditional trappings and formalities of Christianity, which had been slowly building throughout the previous 1500 years. This was an attempt to purify the church and their own lives.


Write my Essay on The Puritans


The Puritans were not a small group of people. In England many of their persuasion sat in Parliament. So great was the struggle that Englands Civil War pitted the Puritans against the Crown Forces. Though the Puritans won the fight with Oliver Cromwells leadership, their victory was short-lived. The witchcraft trials did not appropriately define their methods of living for one hundred or more years that they formed successful communities. What it did show was the danger that their self-imposed isolation had put them in.


Most of the Puritans settled in the New England area. As they immigrated and formed individual colonies, their numbers rose from 17,800 in 1640 to 106,000 in 1700. Religious exclusiveness was the primary principle of their society. The spiritual beliefs that they held were strong. This strength held over to include community laws and customs. Since God was at the front of their minds, they were to motivate all of their actions. This idea worked both for them and against them.


The common unity strengthened the community. In a foreign land surrounded with the hardships of pioneer life, their spiritual bond made them sympathetic to each others needs. Their overall survival techniques permeated the colonies and made them more successful in several areas beyond what the colonies established to their south.


Each church congregation was to be individually responsible to God, as was each person. The New Testament was their model and their devotion so great that it permeated their entire society. People of opposing theological views were asked to leave the community or to be converted.


Their interpretation of scriptures was a cruel one. They emphasized a redemptive goodness. In principle, they emphasized conversion and not repression. Conversion was a rejection of the worldliness of society and a strict devotion to Biblical principles. While repression was not encouraged in principle, it was evident in their actions. God could forgive anything, but man could forgive only by seeing a change in behavior. Actions spoke louder than words, so actions had to be constantly controlled.


The policy of predestination kept all Puritans constantly working to do well in this life to be chosen for the next eternal one. God had already chosen who would be in heaven or hell, and each believer had no way of knowing which group they were in. Those who were wealthy were obviously blessed by God and were in good standing with him. The protestant work ethic was the belief that hard work was an honor to God, which would lead to a prosperous reward. Any deviations from the normal way of Puritan life met with strict disapproval and discipline. Since the church elders were also political leaders, any church infraction was also a social one. There was no margin for error.


The devil was behind every evil deed. Words of torment flowed from the mouths of expressive ministers as they warned of the persuasiveness of the devils power. The sermons of Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan minister, show that delivery of these sermons became an art form. They were elegant well-formed scriptures with a healthy dose of fear woven throughout the fabric of the literary construction. Grammar children were quizzed on the material at school and at home. This constant subjection of the probability of an unseen danger led to a scandal of epidemic proportions.


In 1688, four young girls accused a laundry woman of "bewitching" them. What could have been stopped progressed into a community tragedy. The young women enjoyed the attention this story afforded them, but no doubt were afraid that their lies would be found out. In an effort to further interrupt their story, they lapsed into expanded convulsions. Those who were possessed by the devil were forced to make confessions of their evil deeds in order to protect their families and properties from harm. Those who denounced witchcraft (thereby calling the witnesses liars) were then accused themselves. In the frenzy to follow, by 160 two hundred persons were in jail, fifty in prison and twenty executed (along with dogs). Cotton Mather, a leader of the group, quietly led the way in bringing this crisis to an end. The devotion they held in maintaining a religious society in isolation fueled the fire of the witchcraft scandal.


Great pains were taken to warn their members and especially their children of the dangers of the world. Religiously motivated, they were exceptional in their time for their interest in the education of their children. Reading of the Bible was necessary to living a religious life. The education of the next generation was important to further purify the church and perfect social living. Three English diversions were banned in their New England colonies drama, religious music and erotic poetry. The first and last of these led to immorality. Music in worship created a dreamy state that was not conducive in listening to God.


For the first time in history, free schooling was offered for all children. Puritans formed the first formal school in 165, called the Roxbury Latin School. Four years later, the first American College was established which was Harvard in Cambridge. Children aged 6-8 attended a Dame school where the teacher, who was usually a widow, taught reading. Ciphering (math) and writing were low on the academic agenda.


In 168, the first printing press arrived. By 1700, Boston became the second largest publishing center of the English Empire. The Puritans were the first to write books for children, and to discuss the difficulties in communicating with them. At a time when other Americans were physically blazing trails through the forests, the Puritans efforts in areas of study were advancing our country intellectually.


The large number of people who attributed to the lifestyle of the Puritans did much to firmly establish a presence on American soil. Bound together, they established a community that maintained a healthy economy, established a school system, and focused an efficient eye on political concerns. Protestant churches of this century still ascribe to the simplicity of worship that they proposed back in 160 when they first set foot on the Mayflower. The moral character of England and America were shaped in part by the words and actions of this strong group of Christian believers.


When the first religious pilgrims came to the new world in 160, to Plymouth, Massachusetts on the Mayflower, it began a wave of such trips. America still had a forming tolerance level, and government, therefore still had plenty of time to be shaped by these


Initial settlers. They brought along their new ideas on religion and government. England, because they controlled these colonies, began to realize that toleration was needed. They then passed the Toleration Act in 168, which said that religious diversity was allowed. This however did not help the feeling of prejudice in England, forcing even more people out. One group that was still persecuted was the Quakers, lead by William Penn, they journeyed to America. When they set up their colony here, even Native Americans, and Catholics were welcome and friends with the Quakers. Their formal name was actually the Religious Society of Friends. This helped to instill this feeling of friendship into American societal beliefs. Puritans, and Separatists had been leaving England for years, and were not as tolerable as their Quaker counterparts. The Puritans, who were based mainly in Massachusetts, believed that their religious convictions were the only right way. They were not tolerant of other ways of thinking. Church and state were one, and clergy members lead the colonies. People were very conformed, and did not associate with the other colonies, religious or otherwise. They rarely met for any reason other than church, and were not known for having free time. This strong diversity between the colonies surprisingly did not create too much controversy but rather made America more tolerant in the long run. There was even a colonial toleration act, called the Maryland Toleration Act passed in 164 that was ahead of the British one, because of the need for it in the colonies more than in England. The governments of the new colonies in America were quite conflicting. The Quakers set up a democratic form of government in which everyone had rights that were protected. Good relations were made with the Native Americans. This included many peace treaties. The most famous of which was signed on June , 168, on the banks of the Delaware River, and stated that the colonists and Indians would live in love as long as the sun gave light. This was a revolutionary idea of this time of aristocracy and sovereignty. Quakers were well known for being very tolerable, and respectful of most lifestyles. The only exception to this was they not being very kind to Catholics, however they did allow them to live in their colonies. Banking, Insurance, and bookkeeping were emphasized, more than anything else, besides religion. However, religion was brought into state affairs. Monthly meetings that were to attend to colonial business were actually prayer services. This meant that there was not a strict separation of church and state, and in modern democracy. The Puritan government was one that was entirely based on the church. Everything was under constant supervision. They were easily manipulated because of conformity and punishment that was severe for sinners, as is demonstrated when the Puritans have the Salem witch scare that resulted in many hangings. Education was the highest stressed issue for the Puritans and banking was thought of as unimportant. Relations with the natives were not particularly good. Puritans tried to avoid contact with these strange new people, as much as possible. A Puritan government was not particularly tolerant, and was more like a ladder because of extensive clergy involvement in everyday life. Though governmentally, the Quakers appeared to be right, Puritans were much more advanced, educationally. Quakers did not stress education, at all. They believed that all you needed to know could be taught through the church, and scripture. They believed that few could read the scripture. They did not see the point in educating the people when all that was needed to know was in the bible and in sermons. They only relied on inspiration and impulsiveness for guidance. This idea did not carry through for long. Eventually the Quakers determined that in order to be an effective society, people had to be educated. This lead to the creation of schools and Universities under the Quaker faith. The first of which was simply a primary and secondary school called the Friends' School. Eventually, Universities were created in and around Philadelphia. Puritans had been educating since they came to the new world. They believed that education was very important, so that children could grow up reading and understanding the bible. There had always been schools in Puritan colonies, and in rural areas they had tutors for their children. Puritans also began to open their own Universities, such as Harvard, and Yale. Education remained strictly religious until after the American Revolution. This educational importance that was espoused by the Puritans began to shape the education of the entire country. In 1647, and 1650, Massachusetts, and Connecticut passed laws mandating the education of children. They said that if a parent did not enroll their child in school then a businessman could automatically take the child into their custody. Free education was being offered in many places in order to promote learning about the bible and going into the ministry. By 1700, 70% of men, and 45% of women could read and write in America, which was an incredible statistic. This also increased the number of missionaries in America, because of the increase in educated people. The only real conflict that occurred in the new world was with Native Americans and the occasional argue was within a colony. The Native American's were not even a very large threat yet, because expansion had not reached its peak.


Thanks to the tolerable feeling of the Quaker colonies, and the enclosed feeling of the Puritan colonies, America remained a very peaceful place to live. America has picked up many of these original colonial ideas. The Puritans especially helped to form our modern day theories and standards for education. They began the first educational establishments in this country and introduced the strict discipline needed to succeed in learning. Many of their schools, such as Harvard, are still in use and are very respected. The Quakers too had a direct impact on current American society. Their tolerant ideas helped to spread the ideals of America. This country was built on tolerance, and democracy. Our Constitution was drawn up with these ideas, and the reason so many people came to the new world was because of the political situation here and its benefits. Also because of their respect for other religions and races, America was built on good values. By coming to the new world because of injustice, the original American colonists helped to create a new country that was religiously, socially diverse, and politically accepting. The injustice that they endured helped to insure that America would not be like that. The original settlers to America helped to shape the way we are today, and the way we are going to be in the future. The ideals they stressed and fought for freedom have been kept with us all and formed The United States in a democratic and tolerable way.


The clearest history of their journey to the New World is found in History of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford (c. 150-1657). It was written about 160. This book tells of the Puritans difficulties with the Indians, the first deadly winter when half the


People died and about their initial successes. The history is written in the Puritans "plain style" of writing. The language is often difficult for us to read today, but it is still much easier than the "ornate style" used by most officials then. Though the earliest Puritans only used the plain style, it has survived in other American writers.


The Puritans had several kinds of literature. By far the most common form is the writing related to Biblical teachings, or sermons, that the church leaders wrote. The Puritans believed that they were in the New World because God had brought them there for a special purpose. They thought that by studying the Bible they could learn more about this way of life. The Puritans went to church regularly to study more about the Bible. The church leaders would speak about the meaning of life in the New World and would give an interpretation from the Bible. Some of their sermons have survived to this day. The most celebrated one is by Jonathan Edwards (170-1758), Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God (17). In this sermon, Edwards talks about Gods kindness even though he has a right to be angry with man.


One of the most significant poets from this period was Anne Bradstreet (c.161-167). Her book of poetry, Tenth Muse Lately Sprung Up In America (1650), was the first book of New World poems published in England. Bradstreet used the plain style of writing that is typical of many early Puritan writers. Her poems are about simple living and about faith in the Puritan way of life. Many of her poems are about her family. One poem talks about the love she had for her husband and his love for her. Another Bradstreet poem tells of an accident on July 10, 1666, the burning of her house. In all her poems, however, she shows her strong belief in God.


Known as the best writer of the Puritan times, Taylors works were not published until 1. A minister for sixty years, Taylors poetry captures the attitudes of the second generation of Puritans in its importance on self-examination. Particularly in an individuals


relations to God. A good edition of Taylors poetry is The Poems of Edward Taylor.


Samuel Sewall was a representative of a new breed of Puritans who took more


interest in secular matters, for example, business, politics, and good living. Sewall kept a diary for almost fifty-seven years (167-17). It was an excellent indicator of the manners and civilization of his time. A good edition is The Diary of Samuel Sewall.


One of the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Winthrop arrived in 160 aboard the flagship Arbella. As governor of the Colony, he established the center of government at Boston. Winthrop began writing his Journal in 160 and continued it till his death. On board the Arbella, he also prepared his famous sermon A Model of Christian Charity.


Michael Wigglesworth, a minister, Wigglesworth is today remembered for two works The Day of Doom and Gods Controversy with New England (written in 166 but published more than two hundred years later). The first book is known as the first American bestseller. It contains an expression of the basic Puritan beliefs described earlier.


Cotton Mather, a member of the powerful Mather family. Cotton Mather produced 444 volumes of written work. Although his writing is educational, moralistic, and filled with references to the Bible, it reveals important information on the history and society of his time. His best-known work is the Magnalia Christi Americana, which gives an insight into


Mathers views on Puritan society. A good edition of his works is Selections from Cotton Mather.


The Puritan settlements put special faith in the power of the printed word. Especially in its capacity to inform, reform, and literally save the community and the individual. The Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded in 160; within a decade the colony had established a college for the training of ministers, acquired a printing press, and began pouring out a steady stream of texts. First an almanac, then devotional verses and sermons by local churchmen. From a modern perspective, one distinguishing quality of writing from the Puritan era its poetry, its historical chronicles, its meditative and devotional prose is its concern with achieving and sustaining an absolute integrity within ones' self, a condition in which the word, the public deed, the private thought, act, and the deeply held system of belief would show no discord, no hypocrisy. Discontinuity would signify a fallen or unrealistically state and grounds for grave concern. When Anne Bradstreet grieves for the home and the worldly goods lost in The Burning of Our House, she chides herself for pettiness and greed that makes her anger seem real. In her elegies for her grandchildren she is struggling harder to reconcile herself to Divine Justice and the hard to make out ways of providence. In Edward Taylors Upon Wedlock, Let by Rain, Huswifery, and other poems about ordinary experience, the details, and pleasures. Quarrels within a person are acknowledged and expressively voiced. But the quarrels must still be settled, the reservations, doubts, and internal insurrections put to rest, if a person is to achieve a state of grace. How different this idea seems from modern ideas of identity in which unresolved confusion and elements of foolishness are often celebrated as the true self, the confusion that makes us credibly human. In contrast to these Puritan voices, Franklin can seem much more modern, when he encounters a contradiction in his thinking or a fault in his nature. It is usually a practical one having to do with his efficiency or his interactions with his fellow citizens. He practically sets out to correct it; and if his success is incomplete, he seems unfazed.


The puritans viewed and celebrated man as an individual, a God-created being. Sinful, yes, but with inherent worth. This presented a direct challenge too much of medieval teaching and was crucial to the success of American Democracy. No one can deny the Puritan contribution on that score. The Mayflower Compact, formed aboard the famous ship to establish civil government for the good of that early colony, was a fundamental document in the development of limited, constitutional government in America. The Puritans gave us a legacy of regular elections, the secret ballot, the federalist principle and even the beginnings of the separation of church and state largely to protect a religious people from government violation. Most important, the Puritans loved God, and incorporated worship of him into the very our daily lives. This allowed the Puritans to be brave in the New World and remain faithful during the most difficult hardships. Of course, the Puritans had their faults. However, the Puritans intellectual power came from mastery of the Bible and his moral power came from living the Bible. Perhaps this has something to do with the puritans having been so thoroughly put down in modern times.


Please note that this sample paper on The Puritans is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on The Puritans, we are here to assist you. Your research paper on The Puritans will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Wednesday, January 29, 2020

This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be

If you order your cheap custom essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!


This essay is about how the media can make heroes out of the wrong people. The media consists of stories in newspapers, articles in magazines or even broadcast to the television.


The media makes heroes out to be brave, courageous, and muscular and all the things you wish you could be. However a hero is a person who is noble, or risks his or her life for others. S/he is someone to be admired. A hero can be anybody who has done something special. Berny Laplant was such a hero as he saved the life of fifty people.


Sometimes the media makes heroes out of people who have not done something good. For example, it can glamourise people who look good or have a lot of money. This happened in 'Accidental Heroes', the real hero was overlooked because he didn't look like a hero that could save fifty people who were on the flight 104.


When the media writes stories, it does not always tell the real or complete story. It only wants the more exciting pieces of the story to attract readers and viewers. An example of this is when Gail Gayle wrote the story about John Bubba, who claimed to be the hero of flight 104. However, John Bubba didn't do what he claimed. The media believed John Bubba's story because he sounded very realistic. He also had the matching shoe that the real hero, Berny LaPlant, had thrown into the back seat of John Bubba's car. The media had found the other shoe that Berny lost whilst he was saving all the people in fight 104.


Cheap College Papers on This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be


The real hero, Berny LaPlant, didn't look like a hero or act like one. Berny saved over fifty people, but the reporter Gail Gayle and the media didn't believe him because he had a police record for buying stolen goods. Instead of researching and finding the real story, all the credit was given to John Bubba. The media did not try to uncover the truth primarily because Bubba acted and even spoke like a hero and everyone believed him. John Bubba lied to claim the reward of one million dollars. John Bubba went from homeless to a hero. Once John Bubba was cleaned up, he didn't look homeless, he looked like someone you could admire and all the people believed he was the hero. This demonstrates how the media may not always publish the full story. Sometimes, they will even make the story believable or adapt it for the reader or viewer's enjoyment.


John Bubba started helping people. For example, he gave blankets to the homeless, and visited the sick in hospital.


Berny LaPlant, who was the real hero of flight 104, did not seem like a hero. He was small and rough looking. He thought about himself. For example, he took off his shoes before he saved all the people from flight 104. He was also a criminal about to go to jail. However, he admired John Bubba because he could not visit the sick and talk to them and give them love like John did.


In 'Accidental Heroes', John Bubba was overwhelmed by all the fame. He felt guilty because he didn't really save all the people on flight 104. John Bubba was going to commit suicide until Berny LaPlant came out onto the ledge with him. LaPlant told Bubba that he was really a hero because he helped and inspired a lot of people. For example, Bubba inspired others and gave blankets to the homeless and told all the television viewers things that made them proud to be Americans. The media glamorized John Bubba to be everything the readers and viewers wanted.


The media can make heroes out to be the wrong people. This is what Gail Gayle did in 'Accidental Heroes'. Despite Gail Gayle knowing Berny LaPlant was the real hero, she still reported that John Bubba saved all the peoples lives. This was because Berny couldn't live up to the life of a hero and did not have the image of a hero. Berny LaPlant was overlooked and John Bubba was portrayed as the hero. This can happen because sometimes the media does not always have or want the full story.


Please note that this sample paper on This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be, we are here to assist you. Your cheap research papers on This essay is about how the media can make heroes out to be will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Monday, January 27, 2020

What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome?

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome? paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome? paper at affordable prices!


What problems did Germany face after WW1


and how were they overcome?


A 'crisis is strictly the point in a disease where the patient is finely balanced between recovery on one side and death on the other. The Weimar republic experienced two periods of crisis. The first was between 11-1, from which it recovered. The second, between 1 and 1 killed it. The crisis of 11- had three causes. One was an external cause, which was the treatment of Germany by the allies. The others were internal, economic collapse and the political putsches; all of these were interconnected. Germany had surrended to the allies on 11 November 118, two days after the formation of the republic. In June 11 the terms of the treaty of Versailles were announced and Germany was held to be 'guilty' of causing the First World War and all of the damage resulting from it. Hence, the German nation was expected to pay compensation.


The aim of this essay is to investigate the problems that Germany faced after world war one and how they were overcome between the years 118-10.


Custom writing service can write essays on What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome?


The Weimar republic was born out of Germanys defeat in the First World War. The German armies had failed to break through the western front against Britain and France. The German people had also suffered great hardship and starvation as a result of a blockade of their ports by the British navy. As a result it was inevitable of German failure and on November the Kaiser abdicated and fled to the Netherlands. Due to the chaos of the collapsing Reich, a new government somehow had to be formed. There were two main possibilities of a government. One, being a formation of a democracy advocated by the social democrats, which at that time were the largest political party in Germany. Another possibility was that Germany would become a communist State, this was the ambition of the Spartacus league led by Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. In January 11 the spartacists tried to seize power with an armed uprising in Berlin. It was the freikorps units that suppressed the spartacist revolt in Berlin, they were seen as numerically weak and the task was not a demanding one in military terms. January 11 showed the freikorps to be ruthless and vindictive by their actions. Their principal victims were Liebknecht and Luxemburg, they were arrested on 14 January and both shot. Their murder had important political consequences. It had poisoned relations between the KPD and the SPD- on whose behalf the freikorps were acting. It also helped to create an atmosphere in which thoughout the Weimar period collaboration of any kind between the two parties was out of the question.


The treaty was signed on June 8th 11.Lloyd George of Britain, Clemenceau of France and Woodrow Wilson of America had conspired together to set the retributions to Germany. They had different arguments and views to put forward but Clemenceau of France had one simple belief, that the only way to gain satisfaction was to destroy Germany. He had seen the north east corner of France in devastation and was determined that Germany would never get the opportunity to do the same again.


To the extreme right the peace settlement was a 'shameful peace', for which the Weimar republic was unquestionably to blame. After 11 democratic politicians who had agreed to the armistice in 118 were constantly put down by the extreme right as the November criminals. When the allies' peace terms were published in May 11, they were condemned not only by the extreme right, but by all political opinion in Germany. There was objection not only to the terms of the treaty but to the manner it was made. When Germany agreed to the armistice, it was assumed that were would be negotiations with the allies. It was further assumed that these negotiations would take place on the basis of Woodrow Wilson's fourteen points. The Versailles treaty was branded a diktat- a dictated peace.


The first of Germanys punishments was the guilt clause where they had to admit full responsibility for starting the war. This also leads onto stating responsibility for all of the war damage, which meant that Germany had to pay reparations. The bulk of which would go to France and Belgium to pay for the damage done to the infrastructure of both countries by the war. The figure was not set at Versailles, it was determined later. The figure was eventually put at £6,600 million, a huge sum of money well beyond Germanys ability to pay. Germany had lost a large amount of territory. Alsace and Lorraine were given to France; Eupen and Malmedy to Belgium; and Posen and West Prussia to Poland. All of Germanys overseas colonies were given to the victors, especially Britain and France, as Mandates, held in trust until they were ready for independence. Germany was also cut back severely as a military power. It was allowed a navy of only six battleships, an army of no more than 100,000 volunteers and no airforce at all. The Rhineland, which was the borderline between France and Germany, was demilitarised to protect France. The German people found these terms extremely difficult to accept. The Government complained that it had no choice but the popular press called for revenge, at first against the allies, but later against the Government which had signed the treaty.


The outcome to this was predictable and in March 10 Wolfgang Kapp marched on Berlin with 5,000 supporters intending to set up a right wing government. The Government withdrew to Dresden and called for a general strike of German workers. Without these Kapp could not hope to govern, and so gave up and fled abroad. This was the first of many attempts to try to overthrow the Republic. He blamed it for the surrender of Germany and the Treaty of Versailles. Kapp spread the false accusation that the German army had been Stabbed in the back' by German politicians. By this they meant that the Government had surrended while the army was still willing to fight. The right however, did not succeed in destroying the Republic with this lie in the early 0's. There were two reasons why the Weimar republic survived in 10. First, the working class rallied to its defence and secondly Kapp had the support of only a minority of the extreme right.


The outcome of the threat from the left parties, was a positive one for Germany as they were never in really serious danger of succumbing to communism in 118-11. One of the reasons for this is that the KPD lacked popular support. The highest share of the vote it received in the Reichstag elections of the 10's was 1.6%. Another reason is that the KPD were poorly led. Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg did not control or direct the Spartacist rising to any great effect in early 11.


Please note that this sample paper on What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome?, we are here to assist you. Your research paper on What problems did Germany face after ww1 and how were they overcome? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!