Thursday, February 21, 2013

How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel?

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel? paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel? paper at affordable prices with !



How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel?


At the beginning of a novel a reader needs to find out where and who the main character is and what they are doing there.


You would expect to find description of their surroundings and then what is going to happen in the story.


Great expectations does all of these in the first two chapters it firstly tells you Who the main character is and then it goes on to explain were pip is by describing his father’s tombstone,


live paper help



I gave Pirrip as my fathers name on authority of his tombstone.


Next it goes on to say how he lives with his sister who has married a blacksmith Mrs Joe Gargery, who married the blacksmith, his sister is not known as her name but by her husbands.


He next describes what he thinks his farther looked like by his tombstone, The shape of the letters on my fathers tombstone, gave me an odd idea that he was a square, stout, dark man, with curly black hair.


He also describes his mother, Also Georgia wife of the above, I drew a childish conclusion that my mother was freckled and sickly.


He also mentions his five brothers who had died early in their lives.


Then it describes where the graveyard is and where pips house is Ours is the marsh country, down by the river.


He starts the story with a convict threatening him, instantly grabbing the attention of the reader. Hold your noise, cried a terrible voice.


He goes on from this to describe what the convict looks like, a fearful man, all in coarse grey, with a great iron on his leg. He says how he looks very worn and tattered, smothered in mud, and lamed by stones, and cut by flints, and stung by nettles, and torn by briars, who limped, and shivered.


He sees the convict is hungry, the convict turns Pip upside-down to empty his pockets, he finds some bread and eats it but he is still hungry and he still has a chain on his leg after escaping the hulks.


So he tells pip to go home and to find him some more food and a file. You get me a file, and you get me wittles, you bring em both to me, or ill have your heart and liver out.


The convict also mentions another more violent convict that has escaped with him. There is a young man hid with me, in comparison with which I am an angel.


In chapter two we see that Pip was brought up by his sister with violence. She established a reputation with herself and the neighbours, because she had brought me up ‘by hand’.


He goes on to describe Joe Gargary, Joe was a fair man, with curls of flaxen hair on each side of his smooth face, and with eyes of such a very undecided blue that they seemed to have some how got mixed with their own whites.


He describes Joe as a sort of Hercules in strength, and also in weakness. Meaning he was strong but good natured.


Joe warns Pip that Mrs Joe has went looking for him with tickler (a cane), Mrs Joe has been out a dozen times, looking for you Pip, and she’s out now making it a bakers dozen, and what is worse, she’s got tickler with her.


Pip hid behind the door hoping not to be found but Mrs Joe found him and ‘tickled’ him.


At tea Pip tries to sneak some bread and butter out down his trouser leg for the convict. I knew Mrs Joe’s housekeeping to be of the strictest kind, and that my larcenous researches might find nothing available in the safe.


But Joe thinks Pip has eaten his bread very fast, I say you know! Muttered Joe, shaking his head at me in very serious remonstrance. Pip old chap you’ll do yourself a mischief , it’ll stick somewhere, you cant have chewed it pip.


For eating the bread fast Mrs Joe gave Pip tar water. Soon a gun was fired Ah’ said Joe ‘there’s another convict off.


When Pip goes up to bed he thinks about the convict and his friend out in the cold. He also thinks he will end up in the hulks for stealing the file and the food. if I slept at all that night, it was only to imagine myself drifting down the river on a strong spring tide, to the hulks.


When Pip went down the stairs he imagined the floor boards calling after him and trying to wake up Mrs Joe. Every crack in every board, calling after me, ‘stop thief!’ and ‘get up Mrs Joe’.


Pip finds a large savoury pork pie, some bread, rind of cheese, half a jar of mincemeat, a meat bone and a bottle of brandy, and finally gets a file and leaves the house.


Much later in the story the convict returns and pays to make Pip a gentleman, but he does not tell Pip it was him until later, and so Pip thinks Miss Havisham has paid for him to become a gentleman to go to London and marry her daughter Estella because they played as children.


I think this is a good start to a novel because it grabs the readers attention by putting it in the first person so it seems like the story has happened and makes the reader feel sorry for Pip.


It also uses action to get the readers attention with the convict threatening pip and then turning him upside-down to empty his pockets .


He uses comical language but he is also being serious an example of this is She almost always wore a coarse apron, why is she did it at all she should not have taken it off, everyday of her life.





Please note that this sample paper on How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on How effective are the first two chapters of Great expectations as the opening of a novel? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!



Sunday, February 3, 2013

Hamlet

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Hamlet. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Hamlet paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Hamlet, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Hamlet paper at affordable prices with !



Hamlet


One of the most unique elements of the Hamlet character is that he is so human. Many


types of readers can identify with him. Hamlet is imperfect, and he is fretful. Hamlet has


human properties, and it is his humanity that I intend to explore. Indeed it is these human


livepaperhelp.com



qualities and imperfections that make his story so tragic. Another tragic part of the play is


the plays irony. Irony is an important tool in the hands of the playwright to achieve both


comical and/or dramatic effect. There is usually little reason for a tragedy to be funny, so


Shakespeare has used this tool to add more tragedy to the play. I will investigate the


nature of this irony. Also, I will investigate the types of conflict that play a major part in


the play and the relationships between Hamlet and the two people who have been closest


to him; Ophelia and the Ghost.


Hamlet cannot share his strong feelings and emotions with his mother or his


girlfriend. While his mother is literally sleeping with the enemy, Ophelia has chosen the


side of Claudius because of her father, Polonius. It is especially difficult for Hamlet to


talk to Ophelia. The only other woman in his life, Gertrude, has betrayed his father by


marrying Claudius. Hamlet may be obsessed with the idea that all women are evil, yet he


really does love Ophelia, because when he finds out Ophelia has died, he cries out, I lovd


Ophelia; forty thousand brothers could not, with all their quantity of love, make up my


sum.(Act V, Scene 1)


The ghost provides Hamlet with a dilemma. In Shakespeares plays, supernatural


characters are not always to be trusted; think of the three witches in MacBeth, who are


instrumental in his downfall. Hamlet does not know whether the ghost is telling the truth


or not. If Hamlet had killed Claudius solely on the ghosts advice, he would certainly have


been tried and put to death himself. There would probably have been a war to choose the


new king. Being the humanitarian that he is, and taking account of his responsibilities as a


prince and future king, Hamlet most likely would want to avoid civil war. Even though


Claudius is a murderer, and probably not as noble a king as Hamlets father was, he is still


a king. He brings order to Denmark. Hamlet does not wish to plunge his country into


chaos. He realizes that this will happen when he kills Claudius. Hamlet is unable to


combine the spiritual world (in the form of his fathers ghost) with the tangible, every-day


world that surrounds him.


There is much irony throughout this play. One occurrence of irony I found


particularly striking was the fact that Hamlet effectively maneuvers himself into the same


position as Claudius. Claudius had attacked and killed a man who did not have the


opportunity to defend himself, but when Hamlet kills Polonius, is he not guilty of the


same? It is intriguing that both Claudius and Hamlet have killed fathers. It is interesting


to see how these two completely different characters deal with this problem in different


ways.


Other interesting parallels I found are the numerous deaths by poison. Hamlets father


was murdered by Claudius with poison. In the final act, the queen is the first to be


poisoned, by drinking from Hamlets cup. Then, Hamlet is wounded by the poisoned tip


of Laertes sword. When they change swords, Hamlet gets the upper hand and Laertes is


poisoned. When the queen dies, Laertes explains all to Hamlet, before he dies. Hamlet


then kills Claudius before dying himself. It is ironic that, as Claudius is poisoned because


of his own plotting, he had already signed his own death warrant when he killed Hamlets


father, the first tragic action of the play. There are only three people in this play who


dont die by poisoning Rosencrantz and Guildenstern meet their deaths in England, after


being outsmarted by Hamlet. The third is Ophelia, who is drowned.


There are three types of conflict I can identify in the play man versus man, man


versus nature and man versus himself. Hamlets fight with Laertes in Ophelias grave and


the subsequent duel would both easily classify as man versus man conflicts. Man also


struggles with nature in this play, most notably in the form of Ophelias drowning and


Hamlets crossing the sea to England - although the latter conflict plays more of a


background role.


The man versus himself conflict is most directly exposed in Hamlets famous soliloquy,


where he is wrestling with his conscience. The realization he comes to in this soliloquy is


that we are afraid to kill ourselves because we do not know what is to be found after


death. Another man versus himself conflict is Claudius inability to pray. He cannot


really justify his past deeds. For him this is actually another step into darkness.


Hamlet may be a thinking man; however, this does not mean he actually likes to think.


Although he might have liked to think in the time preceding the play, when the time has


come for him to take action, he cannot because of this urge to contemplate. His capacity


of thinking becomes a handicap rather than an advantage. And this is not even the most


painful or tragic part of the Hamlet character. The biggest problem is that he is aware of


this. Not only is he incapable of acting without thinking, he knows that this is the case,


which makes the burden even heavier. Hamlet cannot face reality. It is already a


traumatic experience for him when he has to believe the words of the ghost, and actually


the ghosts demanding him to act on this information is too much for him.


Hamlet is however, a man of decision. But he is also contemplative. He needs to think


in order to justify his actions, and his intellectual characteristics are the major difference


between Claudius and himself. Hamlet is very aware of the relationship between action


and reaction and realizes that he has to proceed very carefully. In the play, Claudius is the


decisive character, and the man of action. He takes the first action, the action that sets the


story in motion - the poisoning of Hamlets father. He also instigates the final action, the


poisoning of the blades and the cup; an action that will backfire and cause his own death.


In the play, there seems to be a constant shift of action, where only one party can act at


any time. These two parties are of course Hamlet and Claudius. When Claudius has taken


the action that secures him the throne, he allows Hamlet to become the man of action.


But Hamlet procrastinates. The only action Hamlet takes is staging the play, which seems


more to serve the purpose to establish that Claudius is indeed guilty of his fathers murder.


He does this for himself and for Horatio. Then he proceeds to kill the eavesdropping


Polonius.


Hamlet is given the chance to avenge this foul and most unnatural murder when he


sees Claudius praying. Hamlet, being a Christian prince, cannot bring himself to kill


Claudius while he is praying, as this would secure his place in heaven. Hamlet wants to


make sure Claudius will suffer in the afterlife, just as his father did. Hamlet leaves just


before Claudius gets up, declaring he cannot pray; My words fly up, my thoughts remain


below Words without thoughts never to heaven go (Claudius, Act III, Scene ). Had


Hamlet known Claudius was unable to pray, then he could have had his revenge right then


and there, instead of waiting until the end, and taking everyone else with him.


Most of the other characters would probably have acted much quicker than Hamlet if


they were in his position. Imagine Polonius in the situation Hamlet found himself in. He


would not procrastinate as much. It would have most likely been off with the head of the


murderer! Any other character in the play would not have stayed as quiet as Hamlet does


(confiding only in his best friend, and even keeping the truth from his mother until the end


of Act III). Although not every one of them might have come to killing Claudius. But


Hamlet does not seem to do anything. Again, he thinks too much. But why?


Hamlet is self-conscious, while the majority of characters that surround him are not.


This explains why he feels inhibited to act. Hamlet resembles a real person more than any


other character in the play, which might be another reason why he still remains a subject of


discussion, and why the play remains so popular. Hamlet is one of the most interesting


characters in English fiction because we can identify with him, and understand, although


not always agree with his actions.


Hamlet is also set apart by his elusiveness. Many of the characters in the play can be


categorized within minutes of their introduction. Im not calling them caricatures, but


there is definitely a caricature-like side to some of them. The pompous Polonius and the


deceitful and thick-headed Guildenstern and Rozencrantz come to my mind. However,


this does not hold true for some other characters, such as Laertes and Ophelia.


The character of Hamlet refuses categorization. Interesting with regard to this is his


love of theater. He is particularly interested in the idea that things may seem different


from what they really are, just like the people that surround him. His mother is no longer


his fathers wife, but his uncles, his girlfriend is no longer there for him, and Guildenstern


and Rosencrantz are no longer his friends. Also, he is aware that he will have to disguise


himself and his real motives and goals in order to attain them - this is why he fakes his


madness. It is not until he picks up Yoricks skull in the beginning of Act V that he finds


out what is real and what not. In the end, when the truth is revealed and everyones


masks are removed, death is all that is to be found.





Please note that this sample paper on Hamlet is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Hamlet, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Hamlet will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!